|
The following is an excerpt from an
article I wrote for one of the manufacturers about why we (hearing
instrument dispensers) should recommend and sell FM systems along with
our hearing aids. This is provided to give you insight into what
I am thinking when I make
recommendations for people with more active lifestyles.
Personal Communication Systems the Next
Evolutional Step
By Jay Thurman; B.Sc., BC-HIS
My wife and I were out shopping the other day and stopped to get a
bite to eat at a nice restaurant.
There was music playing in the background and the restaurant
was very busy as it was the lunch hour.
While we were sitting at our table talking I noticed an older
couple being seated at the table across from us. They must have been
in their mid-seventies and I also noticed that he was wearing binaural
digital ITE hearing aids with directional microphones. Halfway through
our meal my wife made the comment that it seemed so sad that the older
couple were just starring off into space while they were eating and
never saying a word to each other. I started to observe them through
the balance of our meal and came to the same conclusion that my wife
had. They never spoke to each other. They would look at each other at
times but then just start looking at the ceiling. This brought back
memories of a patient I had worked with and his spouse who, when I was
explaining the advantages of using a Personal Communication System
(PCS) and how it could be used in a restaurant she had broken down in
tears. When I asked her what the reason for crying was she said “I’m
so tired of going out to eat and eating alone.” I realized that was
what we had just witnessed, two people going out to eat together, but
eating alone, and it left me feeling sad. I was also sad, and just a
little angry, because someone who had taken on the responsibility of
helping that person improve both his listening ability and his quality
of life had only done half their job. One of the things I would like
to help accomplish is to never have to see couples going out to eat
together and ending up alone when we have the technology to allow them
to enjoy each other’s company while dining out.
Defining the Problem
Today’s modern hearing aids are both sophisticated and extremely
adjustable. The hearing aid can be fit to compensate for a person’s
hearing loss plus meet their personal needs for sound quality to what
they hear, which is a very personal perception. Good hearing aids
coupled with good fitting should allow our patients, with moderate to
moderately severe hearing losses, to listen to speech in a quiet
environment at between twelve to fifteen feet from the source. This
distance will shrink as the patient’s loss increases and/or their word
recognition decreases. In a moderately noisy environment, with the
patient wearing good hearing aids equipped with digital directional
microphones that are fit correctly, we can reasonably expect our
patient to hear at a range of five to six feet. This is because we
make the assumption that the sound source our patient wants to hear is
within six feet and everything beyond six feet is sound clutter in the
environment. Also physics and the inverse square law start to come
into play generally beginning at about six feet in a mildly sound
cluttered environment. The effect of this law is to reduce the sound
source we want to listen to closer to the ambient environmental noise
threshold causing a loss of speech recognition. It also must be kept
in mind that ambient noise environments that our patients believe to
be quiet are in reality mild to moderately noisy environments. This
means that most home environments are not quiet even if the hearing
aids are acting like it is. These environmental noise levels reduce
both the range at which our patient can listen to conversation and the
clarity of speech.
How many times have we heard our patients or their spouses complain
about not hearing or being heard in the home and the distances
involved are between six to twenty-four feet. How many times have we
heard our patients could not hear their friends or family members when
they came over to the house and the distance between our patient’s
chair and the couch was ten to fifteen feet and the distance at the
dinner table was five to ten feet. Plus, we have the complaint “my
wife expect me to hear her when I’m watching the news (it’s always the
news, never sports) and she is talking to me from the bedroom or the
kitchen (generally working at the sink with water running). And they
always ask us “why don’t these new, fancy, and extremely expensive
digital hearing aids improve my ability to hear my spouse better then
my old aids?” The answer we need to give them involves a physics
lesson in sound propagation followed with the problem’s solution. Or
maybe the correct answer should be a physics lesson with a complete
solution before we sell them that NEW, FANCY, and EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE
DIGITAL HEARING AID. Maybe we need to incorporate both that expensive
new hearing aid plus an integrated package of on-board and/or
out-board devices designed to overcome or bypass the inverse square
law and/or the acoustical physics of sound propagation that’s the
problem.
|